Naomi Osaka vs Su Jeong Jang Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Osaka vs S. Jeong Jang

Naomi Osaka
JPN
w
w
w
w
l
l
w
l
w
w
0
Win
1
Played
1
Win
28
Age
30
1.80m
Height
-
16
C. Rank
592
1
Best Rank
114
7
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$24.1M
Career Money
$356.0K
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)
Plays
Right-Handed

Su Jeong Jang
KOR
l
l
l
w
w
w
l
w
w
l
0
Win
1
Played
1
Win
28
Age
30
1.80m
Height
-
16
C. Rank
592
1
Best Rank
114
7
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$24.1M
Career Money
$356.0K
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Osaka 0 - 1 Jang
They have played 3 sets in total, with Naomi Osaka winning 1 and Su Jeong Jang winning 2. The last match between Su Jeong Jang and Naomi Osaka was at the Seoul, 18-05-2015, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Draw getting the victory 3-6 7-6(4) 6-2.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Osaka | 0 |
Jang | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) Seoul(05-18-15)
Su Jeong Jang
3
7
6
Naomi Osaka
6
6
2
N. Osaka vs S. J. Jang H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$24,149,734 | Career Prize Money | $355,985 |
64.46% (341-188) | Career Total W/L | 58.96% (441-307) |
0 | Hard | 1 |
8 | Titles | 13 |
0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
66.67% (30-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
N. Osaka vs S. J. Jang Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Naomi Osaka has won 42.43% of points on their second serve, while Su Jeong Jang has won 41.49%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Naomi Osaka, in recent form, has won 51.21% of their opponent's second serve points, while Su Jeong Jang has won 53.47%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.82% and 33.33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Naomi Osaka has saved 43.30% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Su Jeong Jang has saved 42.86% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Naomi Osaka has won 70.00% of matches played (W/L 35/15), with Su Jeong Jang winning 38.71% (W/L 12/19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Naomi Osaka has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 233/115), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 55% (W/L 24/20). Su Jeong Jang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 78/39), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 18/14).
- Player level: In the last year, Naomi Osaka has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 65.00% of matches (W/L 13/7), where as Su Jeong Jang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40.74% of matches (W/L 11/16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Naomi Osaka winning 0 times and Su Jeong Jang being victorious 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Naomi Osaka winning 1 and Su Jeong Jang winning 2.
- The last match between Naomi Osaka and Su Jeong Jang was at the Seoul, 18-05-2015, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Draw getting the victory 3-6 7-6(4) 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Naomi Osaka has played against opponents with an average rank of 90.72 while Su Jeong Jang has played against players with an average rank of 307.29.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Naomi Osaka has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Su Jeong Jang has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Naomi Osaka has converted 35.42% of breakpoint opportunities, and Su Jeong Jang has converted 39.60% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Naomi Osaka vs Su Jeong Jang Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Osaka vs S. J. Jang H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
1 | Sets Won | 2 |
14 | Games Won | 16 |
0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Osaka 49%, Jang 43%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Osaka 55%, Jang 54%.
Break Points Saved %: Osaka 59%, Jang 52%.
N. Osaka Recent Matches Played
S. J. Jang Recent Matches Played

N. Osaka vs S. J. Jang Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
64.46% (341/188) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.96% (441/307) |
61.06% (740/472) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.04% (984/741) |
54.72% (6143/5084) | Games Win/Loss | 53.45% (8391/7308) |
66.95% (233/115) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.43% (309/229) |
60.00% (66/44) | Clay Win/Loss | 66.67% (78/39) |
66.67% (18/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 59.02% (36/25) |
54.55% (24/20) | Grass Win/Loss | 56.25% (18/14) |
0.43 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
2348 | Aces Total | 643 |
0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
998 | Total Double Faults | 1482 |
1:9:32 | Average Match Time | 1:13:35 |
370.87 | Average Opponent Rank | 552.24 |
56% (15317/27213) | 1st Serve % | 69% (22716/32886) |
72% (10996/15317) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (13846/22716) |
48% (5753/11895) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (4540/10170) |
46% (1395/3045) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (2140/4405) |
43% (11585/27178) | Return Points Win % | 47% (15870/33870) |
72.28% (73/28) | Slam W/L | 41.67% (15/21) |
62.76% (91/54) | Masters W/L | 50.00% (2/2) |
75.00% (6/2) | Cups W/L | 64.00% (16/9) |
59.29% (83/57) | Main Tour W/L | 36.54% (19/33) |
65.79% (75/39) | Challenger W/L | 59.81% (311/209) |
61.90% (13/8) | Futures W/L | 70.27% (78/33) |
65% (338/517) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (436/741) |
0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
53% (65/122) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (71/131) |
64% (104/162) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (125/230) |
90% (319/287) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (411/362) |
10% (319/31) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (411/49) |
26% (210/55) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (337/78) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
12:30 PM 17/10/25
PredictionW1
2.78
W2
1.44
10:00 PM 16/10/25
PredictionW1
1.26
W2
3.84
04:00 PM 17/10/25
PredictionW1
1.133
W2
5.25
10:00 AM 17/10/25
PredictionW1
1.6
W2
2.23
06:00 AM 17/10/25
PredictionW1
2.1
W2
1.68
10:00 AM 17/10/25
PredictionW1
1.48
W2
2.52
Potential H2H Matches This Week
Osaka (Japan Open - Osaka)
Osaka vs CirsteaCould play in The Final
Osaka vs GolubicCould play in The Final
Osaka vs FernandezCould play in The Final
Osaka vs SramkovaCould play in The Final
Osaka vs DanilovicCould play in The Semifinals
Osaka vs ValentovaCould play in The Semifinals
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
16 Oct 2025
Abierto Tampico – Tampico Preview And Prediction: Hanne Vandewinkel vs Marina Stakusic Betting Tips & Picks October 17, 2025
16 Oct 2025
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Eliot Spizzirri Prediction – ATP European Open – 16th October 2025 Best Bets
16 Oct 2025
Simona Waltert vs Miriana Tona Prediction – WTA Rio Ladies Open – 16th October 2025 Best Bets
16 Oct 2025
Jacob Fearnley vs Elias Ymer Prediction – ATP BNP Paribas Nordic Open – 16th October 2025 Best Bets
16 Oct 2025
Renata Zarazua vs Sofia Elena Cabezas Dominguez Prediction – WTA W100 Macon – 16th October 2025 Best Bets
16 Oct 2025
Alejandro Tabilo vs Daniil Glinka Prediction – ATP Olbia Challenger – 16th October 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
H2H 5-3
11:00
H2H 2-0
17:00
H2H 0-2
05:00
H2H 0-2
Tennis Events This Week
Almaty Open - Almaty
Kazakhstan
BNP Paribas Nordic Open - Stockholm
Sweden
European Open - Brussels
Belgium
Curitiba Challenger
Brazil
Hersonissos 6 Challenger
Greece
Lincoln Challenger
United States
Olbia Challenger
Italy
Shenzhen Challenger
China
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Santa Margherita di Pula
Italy